Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing)

On September 18, 2014 at 10:51:30 AM, Daniel Glazman ( wrote:
> > I suspected that but, w/o direct knowledge of the way AB handles  
> Standing, I suggested to preserve it for AB. I see now that the  
> issues I highlighted for WGs are also valid for AB. Probably for TAG too  
> then.

It's just an empty threat tho (and hence just wasting space in the process doc). Seems kinda pointless still to keep it for the TAG as it's never has, and will never be, applied. 

Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 14:58:42 UTC