- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:18:01 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 16/09/2014 15:06, Daniel Glazman wrote: > AFAIK, the oldest WG in the Consortium, the CSS WG, has never used > Standing. Each time we discussed it, it was either impractical or > impossible. I think we should be able to ditch it _entirely_ except in > the case of AB and TAG. Let me add one important thing: we're here to gather all good ideas wherever they come from, for the greatest benefit of the Web. I can't imagine a reasonable Chair refusing to register a vote or poll for a Member in "bad standing" if that Member contributes a technically valid and useful point of view... </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:18:26 UTC