Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing)

On 16/09/2014 15:06, Daniel Glazman wrote:

> AFAIK, the oldest WG in the Consortium, the CSS WG, has never used
> Standing. Each time we discussed it, it was either impractical or
> impossible. I think we should be able to ditch it _entirely_ except in
> the case of AB and TAG.

Let me add one important thing: we're here to gather all good ideas
wherever they come from, for the greatest benefit of the Web. I can't
imagine a reasonable Chair refusing to register a vote or poll for a
Member in "bad standing" if that Member contributes a technically valid
and useful point of view...


Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:18:26 UTC