- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:36:00 -0400
- To: "David (Standards) Singer" <singer@apple.com>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- Cc: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
On September 12, 2014 at 2:06:39 PM, Marcos Caceres (marcos@marcosc.com) wrote: > > And, when PRs are used for contributions, the workflow above > also facilitates tracking the provenance of contributions. Exactly. Down to the commit level. For those not familiar with GitHub, click on any "n commits" under the names - you can drill down from there: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/graphs/contributors (Note that my specs don't even list "Editors" any more, they literally just point to the contributor list - it removes the egos and provides an objective account of who contributed what). To see what a feature branch that has undergone review by multiple individuals looks like: https://github.com/w3c/netinfo/pull/16 In that example, Ilya and I worked together on a feature after having reached agreement with the larger group in: https://github.com/w3c/netinfo/issues/13 In the above, you can see exactly which 7 participants where involved in reaching consensus to add a feature. It's so nice to collaborate like this... just sayin'.
Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 19:36:30 UTC