Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec

On September 2, 2014 at 2:27:43 AM, Daniel Glazman (daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com) wrote:
> On 02/09/2014 08:22, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> Then you'll have the same problem with ISO and other Standard Bodies,
> de jure or de facto, that did fork specs 'in extenso' in the past and
> will do it again in the future because they feel they need it. More
> importantly, you'll be doing one mistake W3C did in the past.

We can cross that bridge when we get to it. Right now, stopping the W3C from copy/pasting the WHATWG specs is what matters.

-- 
Marcos Caceres

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 15:53:10 UTC