- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:31:30 -0400
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
On September 3, 2014 at 12:20:51 PM, David Singer (singer@apple.com) wrote: > > Even if it’s true that single objections rarely carry the day, > if everyone behaved this way, we could have the absurd situation > in which most people objected to something but no-one bothered > to say so. These checks presume that if we care, we say so, and then > everyone knows where we stand. Even if we proceed, it’s useful > to know the level, nature, and origin of concerns, and have them > on record. That's fair. We will be sure to object to any publication of copy/pasted specs going forward (and eventually seek to have them removed from W3C charters). The W3C now have a pretty extensive record of people's concerns. > You do realize that you (pl.) are spending a heck of a lot more time > on this after the fact than a simple objection to the charter would > have taken, and your position now would also be a whole load more > credible had you objected? We were acting in good faith in that the people copy/pasting the specs would be able to handle this task. To date, they haven't so we are trying to put a stop to it (as it's demonstratively doing more harm than good).
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 16:32:02 UTC