- From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:52:04 +0200
- To: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Hi, I request the following be put on the agenda asap: ISSUE-34 (good standing). There has been significant discussion on the list this week. ISSUE-64 (errata page). I think this can be closed, since we have a pointer to the editor's draft and the issue tracker, which collectively serve the function ISSUE-97 (should the AB be called a "Board"). I think we can close this with the answer "probably not, but changing it doesn't produce enough benefit to justify the work" ISSUE-115 (updates of activities). I hope my proposal on list can be adopted ISSUE-121 (information about what is known of the IPR in an ecosystem). I hope my proposal on list can be adopted. ISSUE-124 (blacklist WHATWG as normative references). I think this can be summarily closed - there seems to be no support for it anywhere, plenty of people have spoken against it. -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:52:34 UTC