Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec from Daniel Glazman on 2014-09-02 (public-w3process@w3.org from September 2014)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:27:00 +0200
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <54056334.4060304@disruptive-innovations.com>

On 02/09/2014 08:22, Marcos Caceres wrote:

> Not if the W3C agrees to stop copy/pasting. Then it's problem solved. 
> 
> People are quite capable of reaching agreement without needing to get
> all legal on each other. 

Then you'll have the same problem with ISO and other Standard Bodies,
de jure or de facto, that did fork specs 'in extenso' in the past and
will do it again in the future because they feel they need it. More
importantly, you'll be doing one mistake W3C did in the past.

</Daniel>

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 06:27:27 UTC