- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:28:59 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 16/09/2014 17:19, GALINDO Virginie wrote: > Daniel, > Last time I tried to make some 'good standing' sanity check (based mainly on attendance/contribution), I was blocked at STEP 1 on the basis that (1) people not participating do not cause any harm, (2) if you loose poeple, you lose their IP commitment. > I believe that, as chair, we need to have a fair and representative participants list, and I support the rationale of your suggestion. Virgine, if you lose PEOPLE, you don't lose IP commitment. IP commitment is made by Members, and the Members who make IP commitment usually care about their participation and will reply with a commitment to increased participation, or have more than one rep in the WG and one less is not an issue at all... </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 15:29:27 UTC