- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:38:37 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 9/8/2014 9:21 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 9/8/14 9:17 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote: >> The big problem here is not public v private. The big problem is >> that Art's comments are inaccurate. > > Oh dear ;-) > > Would you please then clarify which items of the [NRP] checklist > disqualify WHATWG's URL spec from being acceptable in the HTML5 PR? The word "disqualify" is not the right word. The Director weighs the considerations in the NRP document. No single condition is a black and white disqualification. To my knowledge the Director has not looked at the WHATWG URL document from the perspective of normative references. But on a call last Friday (which involved Team, and Chairs from WebApps and HTML - but not the Director) it was suggested that there were several conditions in the NRP document that would not apply. > > -Thanks, AB > > [NPR] <http://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references#orgs>
Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 13:38:53 UTC