Anne van Kesteren
Arthur Barstow
- Re: Please Review: Working Draft for new Process Document (Tuesday, 30 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-131 (meetings and workshops): Clarify the requirements on meetings and workshops [Process Document] (Sunday, 14 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Wednesday, 10 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Issue-123 [Was: Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September (Tuesday, 2 September)
Boris Zbarsky
chaals@yandex-team.ru
- Minutes from today (Tuesday, 30 September)
- New draft - Fwd: Please Review: Working Draft for new Process Document (Tuesday, 30 September)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Tuesday, 30 September)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Monday, 29 September)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Thursday, 25 September)
- agenda requests... (Thursday, 18 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Thursday, 18 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-131 (meetings and workshops): Clarify the requirements on meetings and workshops [Process Document] (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: ISSUE-115 - group status information (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Moved ISSUE-107 (Saturday, 13 September)
- Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Saturday, 13 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-129 (CGs): Should the Process define Coordination Groups? [Process Document] (Saturday, 13 September)
- Re: IPR briefing for new charters… (Saturday, 13 September)
- New draft available (Saturday, 13 September)
- IPR briefing for new charters… (Saturday, 13 September)
- ISSUE-115 - group status information (Saturday, 13 September)
- Going off-topic Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Off topic? Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September (Tuesday, 2 September)
Chris Wilson
Daniel Appelquist
Daniel Glazman
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Wednesday, 24 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Thursday, 18 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Saturday, 13 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Wednesday, 10 September)
- Re: Issue-123 [Was: Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Monday, 1 September)
David (Standards) Singer
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Tuesday, 30 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Saturday, 13 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Process lessons from Web Performance? Re: publishing new WD of URL spec (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Wednesday, 10 September)
David Singer
Domenic Denicola
GALINDO Virginie
Glenn Adams
Ian Hickson
James Robinson
JC
Jeff Jaffe
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Tuesday, 30 September)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Sunday, 28 September)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Tuesday, 23 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Thursday, 18 September)
- Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] (Saturday, 13 September)
- Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Status of the 12 High Priority Topics considered for Process2014. (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
Josh Soref
Karl Dubost
Marcos Caceres
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Thursday, 18 September)
- Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Saturday, 13 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec (Monday, 1 September)
Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Philippe Le Hegaret
Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
- w3process-ACTION-34: Open issue on removing coordination groups (Tuesday, 30 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-142 (AB role/structure): Are the role and structure of the AB adequately defined? [Process Document] (Friday, 19 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-141 (Errata): Improve Errata management in W3C [Process Document] (Thursday, 18 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-140 (The Team in the process): The description of the Team in Section 2.2 of the process document is out of date [Process Document] (Thursday, 18 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-139 (non-members in member submission): What are the rights and obligations of non-member participants in the creation of a member submission [Process Document] (Thursday, 18 September)
- ISSUE-138: Does the process assume â??anâ?? editor, or is group-editing formally ok? (Tuesday, 16 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-137 (rationalise heartbeat): Rationalise the heartbeats in chapter 6 and 7 [Process Document] (Tuesday, 16 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-136 (Public input): Does process adequately cater for public input [Process Document] (Monday, 15 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-135 (AC appeal in WG): Direct appeal of WG decisions for AC? [Process Document] (Monday, 15 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-134 (Appeal non-WG creation): Appeal against decisions *not* to create a group? [Process Document] (Monday, 15 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-133 (TAG role): Are the role and make-up of the TAG adequately defined? [Process Document] (Sunday, 14 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-132 (voting): Change the voting system for elections? [Process Document] (Sunday, 14 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-131 (meetings and workshops): Clarify the requirements on meetings and workshops [Process Document] (Sunday, 14 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-130 (BG CG process): Should the Process define Business and Community Groups? [Process Document] (Sunday, 14 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-129 (CGs): Should the Process define Coordination Groups? [Process Document] (Saturday, 13 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-128 (Lack of Test Cases): Lack of test cases is a major contributor to schedule delay. [Process Document] (Saturday, 13 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-127 (Horizontal Group Input): Can we improve input from 'horizontal' groups (WAI, I18N, ...) [Process Document] (Saturday, 13 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Wednesday, 10 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-125 (NRP-transparency): Comments for Normative Reference Policy should be transparent [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
- w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] (Monday, 8 September)
Robin Berjon
Sam Ruby
Stephen Zilles
- RE: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Monday, 29 September)
- RE: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September (Thursday, 25 September)
- FW: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 23 September (Tuesday, 23 September)
- RE: ISSUE-115 - group status information (Monday, 22 September)
- RE: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] (Friday, 12 September)
- RE: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- RE: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] (Friday, 12 September)
- RE: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] (Friday, 12 September)
- RE: Process lessons from Web Performance? Re: publishing new WD of URL spec (Friday, 12 September)
- Status of the 12 High Priority Topics considered for Process2014. (Thursday, 11 September)
- Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September (Monday, 1 September)
Steve Faulkner
Yoav Weiss
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2014 22:12:16 UTC