[dxwg] Pull Request: Consolidating property definitions for catalog
[dxwg] Pull Request: Consolidating property definitions for catalog
Closed: [dxwg] Dataset access [RDSA] (#59)
Closed: [dxwg] Dataset type [RDST] (#64)
Closed: [dxwg] Licenses/rights/obligations on Services (#248)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
- RE: DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
- RE: DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
- RE: DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
- RE: DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
- RE: DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
[dxwg] Definition and note of prof:hasToken (#723)
[dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
[dxwg] Clarify PROF's relation to constraint languages (#721)
DCAT Sprint (Distributions)
DCAT Sprint (Distributions)
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT Issue 353 - Remove normative statement from non-normative section
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT Issue 353 - Remove normative statement from non-normative section
Re: [dxwg] Remove normative statements from non-normative sections of document (#353)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added ? to all refs not explicitly marked as normative
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added ? to all refs not explicitly marked as normative
dxwg-ACTION-288: to send out announcement of sprint meeting
dxwg-ACTION-287: to set up webex for sprint
dxwg-ACTION-286: to propose changes to add a note re legacy use of dcat:DIstribution for services more prominent higher in rec
dxwg-ACTION-285: To draft response to Daniel Pop https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Jan/0013.html
dxwg-ACTION-284: To propose solution for discussion on DataServices at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/432
[dxwg] Remove inherited properties from the dcat:Catalog section (#718)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove inherited properties from the dcat:Catalog section (#718)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove inherited properties from the dcat:Catalog section (#718)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Adding license and rights properties to specific classes [do not merge yet]
[dxwg] Pull Request: Adding license and rights properties to specific classes [do not merge yet]
- Re: [dxwg] Adding license and rights properties to specific classes (#717)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT Issue 248 - Adding license and rights properties to specific classes (#717)
[dxwg] Conceptual model: Profile: class vs. property (#716)
- Re: [dxwg] Conceptual model: Profile: class vs. property (#716)
- Re: [dxwg] Conceptual model: Profile: class vs. property (#716)
Re: [dxwg] Use case: modeling permissions, obligations, prohibitions (#224)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: modeling permissions, obligations, prohibitions (#224)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: modeling permissions, obligations, prohibitions (#224)
[dxwg] DCAT Document - where do alignments/relations to other vocabs actually belong? (#715)
[dxwg] Links in 'Participate' header not working (#714)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Pull Request: Fix links to github via config.js
[dxwg] Pull Request: Fix links to github via config.js
Revisions to UC32, UC33, & UC43
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-01-30 ...
[dxwg] Pull Request: Minor editorial changes
[dxwg] Pull Request: Minor editorial changes
dxwg-ACTION-283: Answer bart hanssens wrt issue 701
dxwg-ACTION-282: Send a note about the issue of normative references, copying daver
[dxwg] new commits pushed by jpullmann
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue #710 riccardo
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] Rephrase/Extend the opening of DCAT section about dereferenceable identifiers (#710)
- Re: [dxwg] Rephrase/Extend the opening of DCAT section about dereferenceable identifiers (#710)
- Re: [dxwg] Rephrase/Extend the opening of DCAT section about dereferenceable identifiers (#710)
- Closed: [dxwg] Rephrase/Extend the opening of DCAT section about dereferenceable identifiers (#710)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Github and a few links...
[dxwg] Pull Request: Github and a few links...
[dxwg] Pull Request: Paper reviews
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 661
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
[dxwg] Pull Request: Polish translation
[dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 642
[dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 642
Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
Profiles Ontology subgroup - new meetings
Profiles Guidance collaborative editing
Plenary Agenda, January 29, 2019
- RE: Plenary Agenda, January 29, 2019
- RE: Plenary Agenda, January 29, 2019
- RE: Plenary Agenda, January 29, 2019
[dxwg] Pull Request: Polish translation
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
Proposed agenda for DCAT subgroup meeting 2019.01.30
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Repetition in vocabulary section (#704)
- Re: [dxwg] Repetition in vocabulary section (#704)
- Re: [dxwg] Repetition in vocabulary section (#704)
- Re: [dxwg] Repetition in vocabulary section (#704)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Roles update
[dxwg] Pull Request: Roles update
Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37) (#216)
Re: [dxwg] Profile description model and vocabulary (#323)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile description model and vocabulary (#323)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile description model and vocabulary (#323)
Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
[dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
[dxwg] Comment from Bart Hanssens (#701)
- Re: [dxwg] Comment from Bart Hanssens (#701)
- Re: [dxwg] Comment from Bart Hanssens (#701)
- Re: [dxwg] Comment from Bart Hanssens (#701)
[dxwg] UCR: Re-phrase description of UC26 (#700)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Re-phrase description of UC26 (#700)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Re-phrase description of UC26 (#700)
Re: [dxwg] Announce the PROF FPWD via email (#493)
- Re: [dxwg] Announce the PROF FPWD via email (#493)
- Re: [dxwg] Announce the PROF FPWD via email (#493)
Re: [dxwg] Link to the Resource Roles vocab in the Profiles Ont doc (#536)
- Re: [dxwg] Link to the Resource Roles vocab in the Profiles Ont doc (#536)
- Re: [dxwg] Link to the Resource Roles vocab in the Profiles Ont doc (#536)
- Re: [dxwg] Link to the Resource Roles vocab in the Profiles Ont doc (#536)
Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
Closed: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
Re: [dxwg] Alejandra's profiles ont doc edits (#571)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added script to cross-ref examples
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added script to cross-ref examples
Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
- Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
- Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
- Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
- Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
Re: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452)
[dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
[dxwg] Indicate / explain dagram formalisms (#697)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Alignment / differentiation with OWL (#696)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Up front, comprehensive example (#695)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Removed entries now in Specref
[dxwg] Pull Request: Removed entries now in Specref
[dxwg] Create regular text to refer to other Profile docs (#693)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Sundry editorial/html fixes (not complete)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Sundry editorial/html fixes (not complete)
- Re: [dxwg] Sundry editorial/html fixes (not complete) (#692)
- Re: [dxwg] Sundry editorial/html fixes (not complete) (#692)
- Re: [dxwg] Sundry editorial/html fixes (#692)
DCAT sprint scheduling: poll for availability
Re: [dxwg] Add 'Security and privacy' section to all the documents (#460)
[dxwg] DCAT Recommendation - Security and Privacy section (#691)
[dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
- Re: [dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
- Re: [dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
- Re: [dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
[dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689)
[dxwg] Unused namspaces in profilescont.ttl (#688)
[dxwg] Ambiguous relationship in Figure 1 (#687)
[dxwg] Ambiguity in Abstract and Introduction (#686)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue79 - general qualified-forms pattern documented
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue79 - general qualified-forms pattern documented
dxwg-ACTION-281: Set up doodle poll for sprint arrangements
Closed: [dxwg] Primary and alternative identifier [RIDALT] (#67)
Re: [dxwg] Primary and alternative identifier [RIDALT] (#67)
Closed: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
Closed: [dxwg] Re-write intro to DCAT (#457)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 661
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial fixes
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial fixes
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial fixes (#684)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial fixes (#684)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial fixes (#684)
[dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
dxwg-ACTION-280: Reply to Nuno F, asking for more details and mentioning sitempas & manifest files
dxwg-ACTION-279: Reply to 2nd Luca's comment
dxwg-ACTION-278: Prepare a report about Ine's email and send it to the group
[dxwg] Pull Request: Align document with RDF content
[dxwg] Pull Request: Align document with RDF content
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
Milestones calculator
Schedule
[dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #457 [do not merge yet]
DCAT sub-group (November-April schedule).
DCAT sub-group (November-April schedule).
[dxwg] Compile PROF implementation evidence (#681)
[dxwg] Compile DCAT-rev implementation evidence (#680)
- Re: [dxwg] Compile DCAT-rev implementation evidence (#680)
- Re: [dxwg] Compile DCAT-rev implementation evidence (#680)
- Re: [dxwg] Compile DCAT-rev implementation evidence (#680)
- Re: [dxwg] Compile DCAT-rev implementation evidence (#680)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
DCAT - Section about quality and Issue 58
Agenda January 23, 2019 - Profile Guidance subgroup
[dxwg] Returning profiles for QSA queries (#679)
[dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
[dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
Re: [dxwg] Profile version representation by identifier (#391)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile version representation by identifier (#391)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile version representation by identifier (#391)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Agenda Jan 22 2019 - assessing our progress
[dxwg] Add examples on DCAT section on licences and rights (#676)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo
[dxwg] Comments to DCAT identifier section (#675)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added @id attr to examples + editorial changes
- Re: [dxwg] Added @id attr to examples + editorial changes (#674)
- Re: [dxwg] Added @id attr to examples + editorial changes (#674)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added @id attr to examples + editorial changes
[dxwg] Proposal for numbering examples for cross-referencing (#673)
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for numbering examples for cross-referencing (#673)
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for numbering examples for cross-referencing (#673)
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for numbering examples for cross-referencing (#673)
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for numbering examples for cross-referencing (#673)
- Closed: [dxwg] Proposal for numbering examples for cross-referencing (#673)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
Re: [dxwg] add RFC 6906 to profiles ontology (#629)
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT issue #670 - Eliminate 'smushing'.
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT issue #670 - Eliminate 'smushing'.
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
Fwd: Publishing moratorium for first half of 2019
UCR update has been published
[dxwg] Updated UCR Working Group Note now published
[dxwg] Consistent use of intra-document cross references (#671)
- Re: [dxwg] Consistent use of intra-document cross references (#671)
- Closed: [dxwg] Consistent use of intra-document cross references (#671)
Minutes from CNEG Meeting 2018-01-16
Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
[dxwg] 'smushing' (#670)
- Re: [dxwg] 'smushing' (#670)
- Re: [dxwg] 'smushing' (#670)
- Closed: [dxwg] 'smushing' (#670)
- Re: [dxwg] 'smushing' (#670)
dxwg-ACTION-277: - respond to reviewer with issue references
Closed: [dxwg] Ensure de-duplication with concerns in Intro (#379)
Re: [dxwg] Ensure de-duplication with concerns in Intro (#379)
Re: [dxwg] There is a need to distinguish between distributions that package the entire dataset and those that support access to specific items, queries, and packaged downloads of data. [ID51] (5.51) (#267)
- Re: [dxwg] There is a need to distinguish between distributions that package the entire dataset and those that support access to specific items, queries, and packaged downloads of data. [ID51] (5.51) (#267)
- Re: [dxwg] There is a need to distinguish between distributions that package the entire dataset and those that support access to specific items, queries, and packaged downloads of data. [ID51] (5.51) (#267)
Closed: [dxwg] Metadata about server profile support can be used for discovery and mediated traversal via content negotiation. [ID5] (5.5) (#264)
Re: [dxwg] Metadata about server profile support can be used for discovery and mediated traversal via content negotiation. [ID5] (5.5) (#264)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial revisions
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revisions (#669)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revisions (#669)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revisions (#669)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial revisions
[dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 661
[dxwg] Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? (#667)
- Re: [dxwg] Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? (#667)
- Re: [dxwg] Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? (#667)
- Closed: [dxwg] Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? (#667)
- Re: [dxwg] Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? (#667)
- Re: [dxwg] Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? (#667)
Please subscribe to the comments mailing list
dxwg-ACTION-276: Check that everyone subscribed to the comments mailing list
FW: ShEx, profile definitions & conneg
Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-01-16 ...
Proposed agenda for DCAT Teleconference 2019.01.16
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updated URL of MDR-AR
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updated URL of MDR-AR
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updated URL of MDR-AR
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updated URL of MDR-AR
[dxwg] Pull Request: removal of all references to Base Specification class
[dxwg] Pull Request: removal of all references to Base Specification class
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
- Re: [dxwg] removal of all references to Base Specification class (#664)
[dxwg] Defend the use of opaque URIs for profiles (#663)
[dxwg] Differentiata profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
[dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
[dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660)
[dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659)
- Re: [dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659)
- Re: [dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659)
[dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658)
Agenda, plenary, January 15
Need access to spreadsheet
[dxwg] new commits pushed by jpullmann
[dxwg] Pull Request: Ucr profile requirements
Re: [dxwg] qualified attribution pattern (#611)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Further clarification of the DataService hierarchy
[dxwg] Pull Request: Further clarification of the DataService hierarchy
[dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo (#654)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo (#654)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo (#654)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo (#654)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo (#654)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo (#654)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Minor editorial fixes
Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
Re: [dxwg] Related datasets [RRDS] (#81)
Re: [dxwg] Mapping of qualified and non-qualified forms [RQFM] (#80)
Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)
Re: [dxwg] Qualified relationships between datasets and other resources (#651)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information"
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information" (#652)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial revision to sec "Quality Information"
Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD
- RE: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD
- Re: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD
- RE: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD
- Re: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD
Closed: [dxwg] Deleting closed issues from the DCAT document (#633)
Re: [dxwg] Deleting closed issues from the DCAT document (#633)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] Pull Request: Qualified relationships between datasets and other resources
[dxwg] Pull Request: Qualified relationships between datasets and other resources
Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Additional text on scope of DCAT
- Re: [dxwg] Additional text on scope of DCAT (#650)
- Re: [dxwg] Additional text on scope of DCAT (#650)
- Re: [dxwg] Additional text on scope of DCAT (#650)
- Re: [dxwg] Additional text on scope of DCAT (#650)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Additional text on scope of DCAT
Re: [dxwg] Harmonise definitions across Profile docs (#537)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise definitions across Profile docs (#537)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise definitions across Profile docs (#537)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise definitions across Profile docs (#537)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise definitions across Profile docs (#537)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise definitions across Profile docs (#537)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise definitions across Profile docs (#537)
[dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT and potential for extensions (#649)
Closed: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Re: [dxwg] Data catalogues should not treated services as first class citizens (#530)
Closed: [dxwg] Sentence to be fixed in PROF spec (#579)
Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
- Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)
[dxwg] Hydra example for DCAT (#648)
Re: [dxwg] Dataset type [RDST] (#64)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset type [RDST] (#64)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset type [RDST] (#64)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset type [RDST] (#64)
Re: [dxwg] Licenses/rights/obligations on Services (#248)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
dxwg-ACTION-275: to draft note to the list drawing attention to significatn changes in ED
[dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #457 [do not merge yet]
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #457 [do not merge yet] (#647)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #457 [do not merge yet] (#647)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
Closed: [dxwg] Text corresponding to dct:conformsTo for dcat:Distribution should be specific (#621)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Tidy up for closed issue #114
Re: [dxwg] Dataset publications [RDSP] (#63)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Changed text corresponding to dct:conformsTo for dcat:Distribution - …
[dxwg] Pull Request: Changed text corresponding to dct:conformsTo for dcat:Distribution - …
[dxwg] Pull Request: Tidy up for closed issue #114
- Re: [dxwg] Tidy up for closed issue #114 (#645)
- Re: [dxwg] Tidy up for closed issue #114 (#645)
- Re: [dxwg] Tidy up for closed issue #114 (#645)
[profguid] Profile definition v Profile in profiles ontology
Re: [dxwg] Determine final namespace (#398)
Closed: [dxwg] Determine final namespace (#398)
[dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
[dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
[dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
Re: [dxwg] Sentence to be fixed in PROF spec (#579)
Re: [dxwg] Makx's profiles ont doc concerns (#572)
Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
Re: [dxwg] Enable the ability to negotiate the data profile via http, similar to the negotiation of data formats today. [ID30] (5.30) (#265)
- Re: [dxwg] Enable the ability to negotiate the data profile via http, similar to the negotiation of data formats today. [ID30] (5.30) (#265)
- Re: [dxwg] Enable the ability to negotiate the data profile via http, similar to the negotiation of data formats today. [ID30] (5.30) (#265)
- Re: [dxwg] Enable the ability to negotiate the data profile via http, similar to the negotiation of data formats today. [ID30] (5.30) (#265)
- Re: [dxwg] Enable the ability to negotiate the data profile via http, similar to the negotiation of data formats today. [ID30] (5.30) (#265)
Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
Re: [dxwg] Ucr profile requirements updated and PubRules tested (#631)
[dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
[dxwg] Domain of dcat:hadRole (#640)
- Re: [dxwg] Domain of dcat:hadRole (#640)
- Re: [dxwg] Domain of dcat:hadRole (#640)
- Re: [dxwg] Domain of dcat:hadRole (#640)
- Re: [dxwg] Domain of dcat:hadRole (#640)
- Re: [dxwg] Domain of dcat:hadRole (#640)