- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:23:38 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac wrote: > - does PROV need such a complex pattern to represent test results , i.e. with the prov:qualifiedAssociation? can't prov:agent and prov:hadPlan be attached directly to a:TestingActivity > - is a:notConformant from the INSPIRE vocabulary really expected to be used as a dcterms:type of a test result? The example is taken from [UC16](https://www.w3.org/TR/dcat-ucr/#ID16), which reflects how this is done in GeoDCAT-AP - see: https://semiceu.github.io/GeoDCAT-AP/drafts/latest/#conformity-and-data-quality---not-in-iso19115-core This pattern is indeed complex, but this is what the PROV WG suggested - see email thread starting here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2015May/0001.html -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/58#issuecomment-453660993 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 11 January 2019 21:23:39 UTC