- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 22:43:22 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@nicholascar said: > There may be use in having a Base Spec class for relative base-ness. I know this seems counter intuitive at first but: > > From the point of view of DCAT-AP, DCAT may indeed be it's Base Spec. DCAT-AP may wish you to know about DCAT but not really about DC, OWL etc. We already have `dct:Standard` in PROF: cannot we use it for that purpose? -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/641#issuecomment-452478768 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2019 22:43:23 UTC