- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:46:11 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@nicholascar does the change also imply changing some parts of the text of the spec, not only examples? It wouldn't be great if we leave some wording in, which would allude to the old pattern. We may end up in a situation like the one for prof:BaseSpecification, where there might have been a concept drift and there are still parts of the documentation that are not-so-precise about it. NB: in the end I'll trust your judgement about this, I just want to double-check as this editorial aspect of the change has not been mentioned in the issue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/638#issuecomment-453015533 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 08:46:12 UTC