- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:24:32 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
As it's written in the ontology, `prof:BaseSpecification` is a subclass of `prof:Profile` with a restriction on having zero `prof:isProfileOf` statements. @aisaac is saying the notion of a base spec should be emergent from queries.
Is it sensible to declare an `owl:equivalentClass` (below) or just leave it out all together?
```
prof:BaseSpecification
a owl:Class ;
owl:equivalentClass [
a owl:Restriction ;
owl:onProperty :isProfileOf ;
owl:maxCardinality "0"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger
] ;
```
--
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/641#issuecomment-452935107 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 01:24:34 UTC