W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

[dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)

From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:05:59 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-402364273-1548266758-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
andrea-perego has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== UCR: Editorial issues ==
While reviewing the current version of the UCR document, I saw some editorial issues that needs to be addressed. I include here the ones I found:

1. The are still in some places the name of the person who added a comment - see, e.g., [Section 5.32](https://www.w3.org/TR/dcat-ucr/#ID32):

    > (Makx Dekkers) Specific cases of relationships that I have come across:
    > - a dataset that contains multi-annual budget data (e.g. for a multi-annual programme) but also contains the data for individual years -- this could be as a spreadsheet with worksheets for each year and a sheet with the sum for the whole period
    > - two datasets that contain the same data but differ in other aspects than format, for example currency, measurement units, resolution, projection -- if we adopt an understanding that distributions of a dataset may only differ in format

    I guess this needs to be fixed

2. The cited standards and specification are sometimes cited other times directly linked to. The result is that the list of references is not comprehensive

3. All references are said to be normative - see https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#references. Is this correct?

I've started fixing points (1) & (2), and I'll create shortly a PR with a proposed revision

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/683 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2019 18:06:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:11 UTC