- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 20:07:15 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Yes, in some ways this model would work - however dct:Standard is already defined and is not incorrect, so we should reference it. I take the point that the domain of a ResourceDescriptor could be dct:Standard - so if we leave it open it could be applied to dct:Standard - and it could be a subproperty of some more general "qualifiedAssociation" (from what namespace?) its still worth modelling these explicitly as they have additional properties defined with key semantics, and if we want to define SHACL shapes or something for these patterns a class makes sense, -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/716#issuecomment-459089682 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2019 20:07:16 UTC