- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 21:54:57 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@riccardoAlbertoni thanks for the explanation. I'm afraid I'm still lost however. I understand that the BPs in the DWBP document cannot specify a testing plan in detail, and I'm fine with it. But I'm really struggling how the DBWP as a whole can be the source of any conformance test. I would expect that the derivation would be from specific BPs. Maybe my issue is more visible with example 7 than with example 5. I'm not sure how one could say that a test that in its title is said to be derived from the INSPIRE regulation would have only one `prov:wasDerivedFrom` statement and that this statement would have DWBP as a whole as an object, which DWBP is probably much more general than INSPIRE. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/652#issuecomment-453869177 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2019 21:54:59 UTC