- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:23:24 -0800
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Two things: 1) where are the comments related to the ESWC paper? They need to be public for them to "count" as community comments on our work. (Also, not having seen them I obviously have no replies.) Also, do they actually refer to the prof gui paper (which doesn't yet exist) or did this get confused with the ontology deliverable? 2) I think this discussion about base specification is ... odd. There is no universal concept "base specification", it's not something that exists outside of this document. It's not a "named thing" it's a noun with an adjective. It says that a profile is something that is based on something else. That's all. kc On 1/23/19 1:37 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote: > And I have answered in the issue too (well, a PR in fact :-) ) Anyone > who feels like it, please chime in there! > > Antoine > > > On 23/01/2019 00:16, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote: >> Hi Antoine, >> >> No, not really comfortable with it, sorry! So far, the use of the >> phrase "base specification" in text is inevitably linked in the mind >> of the reader to the Base Specification class definition. If we remove >> the class, we would, at the very least, need to re-examine all uses of >> "base specification" but, my preference, is to just remove the term >> altogether and then, on a second reading of the spec without both Base >> Specification and "base specification" determine appropriate wording. >> >> I'll add this comment to the Issue. >> >> Nick >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> >> Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2019 6:59 AM >> To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Agenda January 23, 2019 - Profile Guidance subgroup >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm probably going to not be able to attend this one, sorry. >> I have one extra agenda point: are you ok with my last proposal at >> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/664, i.e. proposing a list of the >> 'base specifications' that I think we should keep? If yes then this >> would allow us to make progress on this PR. >> I'm also happy if someone else wants to take the lead on this, of course. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> On 22/01/2019 12:31, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote: >>> Agenda for the next Guidance group meeting: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:ProfGui-Telecon2019.01.23 >>> >>> Main points: >>> * ESWC paper review – this will likely take the whole meeting as we >>> have 4 detailed reviews >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> *Nicholas Car* >>> >>> /Senior Experimental Scientist/ >>> >>> CSIRO Land & Water >>> >>> E nicholas.car@csiro.au <mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> M 0477 560 177 >>> <tel:0477%20560%20177> P 07 3833 5632 >>> >>> Dutton Park, QLD, Australia >>> >> > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2019 16:23:50 UTC