- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:58:51 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
From @aisaac @kcoyle Good questions. As I'm a bit hesitant to re-open the discussion on definition. Maybe the current one can be understood in a way that alleviates your doubts? (and that's perhaps a part of my action on aligning the view on this ;-) ) On the cardinality aspect, the fact that a profile is a named set (singular) of constraints doesn't rule out that there can be several expressions (i.e. resource descriptors) of this set of constraints, some of which may be partial. On the question of mandating representations (such as the (human-readable) guidance to be a good expression of the constraints, I'm not sure we can do much. The enforcement of whatever PROF would say would have to rely on other mechanisms, as representations that play a guidance role certainly belong to a level which is not the one at which PROF operates (i.e. RDF or any other machine-readable implementation of PROF). I don't see other choice than doing a manual inspection of the representation. Or did you have something else in mind and I've not understood correctly the kind of thing you'd like to mandate? -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/537#issuecomment-453019201 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 08:58:52 UTC