- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:54:57 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@smrgeoinfo , I see your point, but in ADMS `prof:ResourceDescriptor` wouldn't be an `adms:Asset`. If, as you explained, `prof:ResourceDescriptor` is meant to be an association class, it would be something not included in ADMS. I think this is also the approach implemented by @dr-shorthair following up from the discussion in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/638 What I'm unsure of is whether this additional layer of complexity is actually needed, instead of defining roles as (binary) relationships (as I commented in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/638#issuecomment-453664641). -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/529#issuecomment-458755405 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:54:58 UTC