Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)

@nicholascar said:

> Happy with removal if we can do roles in place.

Can you provide an example of this, @nicholascar ? Personally, I don't think we need a role, but stick to what proposed by @aisaac earlier (a base specification is a `dct:Standad` which is not the subject of a `prof:isProfileOf` statement).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/641#issuecomment-452687997 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2019 13:00:00 UTC