- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:30:40 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@makxdekkers I agree that people should be pointed to best practices, but what we are talking about here is the profiles ontology, which is what it is. If the creators of that ontology feel that a "best practice" is to include additional properties then they need to include those either 1) in the ontology itself (just as DCAT does with dct etc.) or 2) they need some additional documentation that states what they would consider to be a "best practice" for users of the ontology. At the moment all that we have is the ontology described in the profiles working draft, so really that's all we can assume as the sum total of the recommendation. Do we consider it complete "as is"? -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/529#issuecomment-458247372 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 28 January 2019 18:30:41 UTC