public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from December 2014 by subject

Adding info of issue id to wiki pages

associating RDF nodes with shapes

AUTO: Bart van Leeuwen is niet aanwezig / Bart van Leeuwen is out of the office. (returning 15-12-2014)

AW: Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages

AW: Re: ISSUE 1: Created a Wiki

AW: tracker brittleness

Can Shapes always be Classes?

capabilities of constraints

Change of RDF Data Shapes WG F2F2 dates

Compact Syntax: Normative exchange syntax or best practice for tools?

condensing the stories

Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014

Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 December 2014

Data Shapes WG agenda for 4 December 2014

Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014

Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 December 2014

Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 December 2014

Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014

Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 December 2014

Global property constraints

Global property constraints (was: Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN)

interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)

ISSUE 1: Created a Wiki

ISSUE 2: Created a Wiki

Issue management

ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource

ISSUE-I Wiki Page Created

Moved S38 into S13

Namespace prefixes

On managing our Requirements wiki page

RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed

rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph?

regrets for today's telco

Requirements editing

resources (RDF, that is)

shape programs [was Re: shapes as classes]

shapes as classes

shapes-ACTION-2: Will investigate how to get requirements into the wiki

shapes-ACTION-3: Will create a new issue to describe the aspect of issue-3 that discuss the nature of shape resources

shapes-ACTION-4: Create new wiki page for issue-3, seeded with his email message

shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start)

shapes-ISSUE-10 (S8 no story): S8 does not have a story

shapes-ISSUE-11 (S9 impossible): S9 is about existing but unspecified values

shapes-ISSUE-12 (S10 story upgrade): S10 needs a better story

shapes-ISSUE-13 (S12 no constraints): it is not apparent where S12 involves constraints

shapes-ISSUE-14 (S14 constraints?): S14 might be about change not constraints

shapes-ISSUE-15 (S17 constraint?): S17 is about access not constraints

shapes-ISSUE-16 (S18 constraints?): S18 does not appear to be about constraints

shapes-ISSUE-17 (S19 and S20 ontologies): S19 and S20 need information to distinguish from ontology recognition

shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required

shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF

shapes-ISSUE-20 (S2 ShExC calling): ShExC example in S2 doesn't indicate how to set it up

shapes-ISSUE-5 (Resource Shape Association): How is a resource associated with shapes?

shapes-ISSUE-6 (ShExC example): Story S2 - upgrade ShExC part

shapes-ISSUE-7 (S4 no story): Story S4 is missing a story

shapes-ISSUE-8 (S6 Clarification ): S6 doesn't clearly state what feature is required

shapes-ISSUE-9 (S7 no story): S7 does not appear to have a story

Some DC requirements

Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN

stories with external pointers

Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"?

tracker brittleness

trying to understand the proposed solutions (OWL constraints, SPIN, ShEx, OSLC Resource Shapes, ...)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 December 2014 20:27:00 UTC