- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:46:09 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Hi Peter, many thanks for starting this. We can iterate it from here. I just wanted to confirm a couple of things. I notice you have apparently bypassed the concept of a hierarchy between the requirements, and instead made a top-level categorization of "Approved" and "Under Consideration". Eric's work had some top-level nodes such as - High-level Language Requirements - Modularization - UI Generation - Foundation - Reasoning/Inference - RDF target constructs - Expressivity - algebraic - lexical patterns - value sets - cardinality - negation - other - multi-record - Protocol/invocation - Implementability - Translation - Outreach - Unclassified I am not saying we should follow the above hierarchy, because even agreeing on such a hierarchy may be too difficult at this stage. So I guess your structure suggests we simply start collecting and then do a second pass to organize and regroup requirements. I can imagine the flat list will quickly be filled with (too) many items. Under "Derived from" I assume we also put links to the user stories. My suggestion is that anyone can now start adding requirements following the template used by Peter, using the controlled term "Derived from" before hyperlinks to details. I believe we should also have a category "Tags" which we could use incrementally to categorize the items. In particular the tags could contain the ID of the original author of the requirement, so that we can keep track of who created what if there are questions for clarification. So, an item could have a line Tags: HK for requirements that were created by myself. The first tag could be the author, and other tags can be added later (esp something like "Expressivity" sounds like a useful tag). Holger On 12/12/2014 7:42, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Done. See https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Requirements > > peter > > > On 12/11/2014 11:40 AM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker > wrote: >> shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a >> few to start) >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/actions/5 >> >> Assigned to: Peter Patel-Schneider >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 22:49:10 UTC