- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:11:39 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
This depends on how you define the term Shape. To me, a Shape is a group of connected constraints, so if a class has no constraints then it is not really a Shape (unless you include the unconstrained Shape to be a Shape too). Holger On 12/13/14, 9:02 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > But are all classes shapes? > > peter > > > On 12/12/2014 02:52 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> >> On 12/13/14, 3:40 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> If "Shape" is more general than "Class", shouldn't all classes be >>> shapes? >> >> Some classes are just named entities without any constraints. >> >> Holger >> >>
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 23:12:12 UTC