- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:12:24 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Holger. I want to bring this back to the requirements on our list, to make sure that they are clear. We have two requirements that I can see, but I don't know if they address this completely: "Expressivity: Language Tags" "Expressivity: Literal Value Comparison"? So for example, if you do not allow duplicate literal values for dc:subject, you can have: dc:subject "foo"@en dc:subject "foo"@fr dc:subject "bar"@fr dc:subject "foo" There are no literal value duplicates in this group. Is this case covered in "literal value comparison"? In this next case, the question isn't duplicate values, but duplicate language tags, regardless of the string portion of the literal value: skos:prefLabel "foo"@en skos:prefLabel "foo"@fr skos:prefLabel "bar"@fr The two "@fr"'s violate the restriction. In the DC use cases, we have yet another case, where two properties cannot have the same literal value: dc:title "foo"@en edm:title "foo"@en One of these would be eliminated as a duplicate. Do the two requirements sufficiently define these cases? kc On 12/15/14 2:23 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Yes they can be expressed by what's on the requirements list right now. > For example here is the SPARQL query that finds all concepts that have > more than one prefLabel per language tag: -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 22:12:53 UTC