shapes as classes

I am uncomfortable with the group saying that shapes are RDF classes, as in

https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Resource_Shape_Association

particular in conjunction with anything that implying that shapes provide 
recognition conditions.  I think that this would put forward the notion that 
the working group is advocating that RDF should be extended to have 
recognition conditions on its classes.


I say this even though OWL classes to provide recognition conditions, and can 
be considered to be shapes.

peter

Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 18:54:21 UTC