Namespace prefixes

• From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
• Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:24:55 +1000
• To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <5480ED47.6030101@topquadrant.com>

Since we do not have a name for the language created by this WG yet, may 
I suggest that we just use the default namespace for hypothetical 
built-in language constructs, and ex: for example resources? E.g.

ex:Person
     :constraint [
         :predicate ex:firstName ;
         ...
     ] ;

(you could implicitly replace the default namespace with "oslc", "rs", 
"spin" or "shape" or "shex" or whatever). I personally don't think the 
language should have the term "shape" in its name, therefore the 
proposal to use neutral territory.

Holger

Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 23:27:49 UTC