www-tag@w3.org from February 2005 by author

Anne van Kesteren

Re: [deepLinking-25] Orbitz supposedly prohibits deep linking (Monday, 14 February)

Bill de hÓra

Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope (Wednesday, 23 February)
[XMLVersioning-41] Scope (Tuesday, 22 February)
[Adding terms to a namespace] XML Events (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
Re: id is Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations) (Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison (Tuesday, 1 February)

Bullard, Claude L (Len)

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Saturday, 12 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)

Chris Lilley

Status of issues/findings I 'own' (Monday, 28 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
AWWW suggested erratum: (Monday, 21 February)

Dan Brickley

Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace (Wednesday, 9 February)

Dan Connolly

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Saturday, 26 February)
DTDs, handling unknown elements [RDFinXHTML-35] (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
minutes TAG 22 Feb for review (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference) (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Need permissions change on IRC Log (was: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (with XML Schema WG)) (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (XMLVersioning-41) (Monday, 14 February)
threading standards [was: Link to ...] (Tuesday, 1 February)

Daniel Veillard

Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Saturday, 12 February)
Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Saturday, 12 February)

Dare Obasanjo

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 24 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)

David Ezell

RE: Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 (Monday, 14 February)
RE: Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 (Friday, 11 February)

David Orchard

RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding (Monday, 21 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 (Monday, 14 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)

Denis

NoSuchMethodException: For extension function (Friday, 18 February)

Didier PH Martin

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Sunday, 13 February)

Elliotte Harold

Re: C14N isn't widely used? (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Saturday, 12 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: Requirement 5 (Thursday, 10 February)

Graham Klyne

Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding (Monday, 21 February)

Harry Halpin

Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference) (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 21 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)

Hugo Haas

Re: Issue i001: what and how many things are we identifying? (Friday, 11 February)

Jan Algermissen

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Sunday, 13 February)

John Boyer

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Sunday, 13 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Saturday, 12 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 9 February)

Jonathan Borden

RE: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 21 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 21 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 21 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)

Karl Dubost

Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)

L. David Baron

Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace (Wednesday, 9 February)

Mark Baker

"Protocol" (was Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Sunday, 13 February)
endPointRefs-47 and identification (was Re: draft minutes TAG telecon 31 Jan 2005 (Tuesday, 1 February)

Mark Nottingham

Re: straw-man agenda for WS-A/TAG Joint Meeting (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary (Tuesday, 1 February)

Michael Champion

Clarification of MS support for the XML namespace (was RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy) (Wednesday, 16 February)

Michael Mealling

Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Friday, 11 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding (Sunday, 27 February)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Saturday, 26 February)
RE: straw-man agenda for WS-A/TAG Joint Meeting (Thursday, 24 February)
RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding (Tuesday, 22 February)
[XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding (Sunday, 20 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
Need permissions change on IRC Log (was: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (with XML Schema WG)) (Tuesday, 15 February)
Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (with XML Schema WG) (Monday, 14 February)
[deepLinking-25] Orbitz supposedly prohibits deep linking (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Requirement 5 (Wednesday, 9 February)
Possible new TAG Issue: relationship of URI schemes to protocols (Monday, 7 February)
Re: Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary (Friday, 4 February)
Re: Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary (Tuesday, 1 February)
Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary (Tuesday, 1 February)
Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison (Tuesday, 1 February)
Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison (Tuesday, 1 February)
Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison (Tuesday, 1 February)
Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison (Tuesday, 1 February)

Norman Walsh

C14N isn't widely used? (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Requirement 5 (Thursday, 10 February)
Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace (Wednesday, 9 February)

Patrick Stickler

Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)

Paul Libbrecht

Re: [deepLinking-25] Orbitz supposedly prohibits deep linking (Monday, 14 February)

paul.downey@bt.com

ws-addr overview for joint meeting with TAG slides (Monday, 28 February)
RE: straw-man agenda for WS-A/TAG Joint Meeting (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
RE: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace (Thursday, 10 February)

Pawson, David

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)

Rice, Ed (HP.com)

RE: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (Sunday, 27 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference (Tuesday, 22 February)

Rice, Ed (Portals Architect)

Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 15 February)

Rich Salz

Re: C14N isn't widely used? (Thursday, 24 February)

Robin Berjon

Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 18 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace (Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace (Wednesday, 9 February)

Roy T. Fielding

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Monday, 14 February)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Sunday, 13 February)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Saturday, 12 February)
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt (Friday, 11 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Friday, 11 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Wednesday, 9 February)
draft minutes TAG telecon 31 Jan 2005 (Tuesday, 1 February)

Stuart Williams

Re: "Protocol" (was Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: minutes TAG 22 Feb for review (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: minutes TAG 22 Feb for review (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Tuesday, 22 February)
Agenda: TAG Telcon 7th February 2005 (Friday, 4 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

Re: id is Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations) (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities (Saturday, 12 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Saturday, 12 February)

Tim Bray

Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Monday, 14 February)
Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (Sunday, 13 February)

Vincent Quint

Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference (Monday, 21 February)
Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference (Friday, 18 February)
DRAFT Agenda of 28 February TAG f2f meeting (Tuesday, 15 February)
Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 (Thursday, 10 February)

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2005 15:38:42 UTC