W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:30:40 -0600
Message-ID: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206C50@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
To: 'Chris Lilley' <chris@w3.org>
Cc: "'Pawson, David'" <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>, 'Jonathan Borden' <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>


Ah so.  Very cool.  Just like antibodies and antigens. :-)

len

From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org]

Oh, I think they *are* replicated on the local machine. Its just that,
when you reconnect to the net, some of them might update. The whole
'dated/unchanging vs latest/changing' thing.

Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 18:31:16 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Baker: ""Protocol" (was Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope"
Previous message: Chris Lilley: "Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy"
Maybe in reply to: John Boyer: "Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy"
Next in thread: Dare Obasanjo: "RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:57 GMT