W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:47:12 -0800
Message-ID: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1042DA3C2@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <www-tag@w3.org>

I guess 'breakage' is the wrong word. On our platforms they can't use
xml:base or xml:id. Although this leads to customer complaints it isn't
breakage since they weren't scenarios that used to work that don't
anymore.  


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
There is always one more bug.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Norman Walsh
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:04 PM
To: www-tag@w3.org
Subject: Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy


I'm sorry, Dare, did you hit 'send' too soon, or are you saying that you
think the fact that you have to declare them is what's going to cause
applications to break? If so, (1) I don't see how and (2) it's no
different than xml:lang or xml:space, do you content that they cause
breakage too for the same reason?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:47:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:32 GMT