W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:58:15 -0600
Message-ID: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206C13@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
To: 'Dare Obasanjo' <dareo@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org

Sure.  But there are some fairly long detailed threads 
at XML-Dev about this issue some of which point out 
that relying solely on well-formed instances is a 
dicey practice at best.

Not that XML-Dev constitutes a specification, mind you, 
but it does inform.

len


From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
Dare Obasanjo

[Dare Obasanjo] Yes. Schema locations are hints not directives. A XML Schema
validator can ignore locations and use schemas it already knows about. 
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 15:58:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:32 GMT