Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities

Elliotte Harold writes:

>> If the canonicalization is exclusive, there's no problem. Either issue 
only arises with original C14N.

Sorry,  was distracted when I typed that and briefly swapped the 
definitions of the two.  Do you agree that the question I asked remains 
significant, albeit with c14n, which is the one that propagates the xml 
namespaced attributes?  Thanks, and sorry for the confusion.

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
02/18/05 12:11 PM

 
        To:     noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
        cc:     Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-tag@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities


noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

> I still have a fundamental question about the presumed use cases. Let's 
> assume we're dealing with a Web Services scenario, and that (exclusive) 
> c14n  is being used at least in part in the obvious way to support dsig, 


If the canonicalization is exclusive, there's no problem. Either issue 
only arises with original C14N.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim