Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> writes: > * Henry S. Thompson wrote: >>Any RDDL document. For example, >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.html. > > What makes people think sending RDDL documents > as text/html is licenced by any specification? Well, that document is valid (modular) XHTML. . . All my browsers render it very nicely. . . What are you suggesting it _should_ be served as? ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 10:45:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:05 GMT