W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:26 -0800
Message-ID: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10437C96F@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of Karl Dubost
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:19 PM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning 
> and Policy
> 
> 
> There are many languages where we can't give the version information.
> What's happening with composite documents with multiple 
> namespace? How do we go back to the version information?
> 
> For example how do I know if I use xml:id version 1.0 or 
> xml:id version 2.0 (if there will be one in the future? Or 
> even funnier if xml:id becomes part of a future XML 2.0

If you can't provide the version information then how are applications
supposed to know how to process the document? 

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
No matter how long or how hard you shop for an item, after you've bought
it, it will be on sale somewhere cheaper.   

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 00:11:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:32 GMT