Hello Jan, > The heart of the matter is, IMHO, that location independent naming > schemas are an illusion with regard > to information systems. The issue is not simply *naming* information but > also *interacting* with it. In order > to interact with the information, you need to bind the name to a > location and simply declaring the naming > schema to be location independent does not save you from this. > > Roy's point is (IMO) that you can use URLs (and the benefit of an > existing, deployed, running system that > comes with them for free) right away since you'll face the 'location > problem' in the end anyhow. I'll answer to both arguments in Roy's answer. Cheers Didier PH MartinReceived on Monday, 14 February 2005 14:41:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:57 GMT