W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:14:42 -0600
Message-ID: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206C4A@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
To: 'Chris Lilley' <chris@w3.org>
Cc: "'Pawson, David'" <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>, 'Jonathan Borden' <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>

So you don't think they are replicated to the local 
machine along with the resources they specify even 
if the machine is only occasionally connected?

Please pardon if I misunderstood your answer.

len


From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 10:45 AM

On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 5:33:03 PM, Claude wrote:

BCLL> On the other hand, it should evolve down to a 
BCLL> semi-stable set of stable DTDs or schemas that 
BCLL> can be replicated.  Relying on an always connected 
BCLL> system is dicey.  That is a recurring pattern of 
BCLL> network design:  what to localize/replicate and 
BCLL> what to centralize/connect to.  

BCLL> Where do catalogs thrive?  It seems to be a best 
BCLL> practice question worth thinking about.

I think catalogs do best as a formalized and application-independent
network cache.
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 17:15:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:32 GMT