W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

Re: C14N isn't widely used?

From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:46:11 -0500
Message-ID: <421E4B23.6020102@metalab.unc.edu>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
CC: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, www-tag@w3.org

Rich Salz wrote:


> I don't know of any XML signature library that implements c14n without 
> also implementing exc-c14n.  


They're not exactly signature libraries, (There are uses for 
canonicalization other than signatures, after all. I use it for 
conformance testing) but XOM 1.0 and genx 1.0 implement canonical XML 
but not exclusive canonical XML. XOM 1.1 will add support for exclusive 
canonical XML.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:46:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:32 GMT