W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

C14N isn't widely used?

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:04:37 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Cc: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Message-id: <87r7j53c0q.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Rich Salz says[1]

   Also c14n can already be broken by xmlns, so this doesn't create a
   new problem, it just makes an existing one bigger. Viewed
   parochially, web services use exc-c14n anyway, so let's use xml:id.

Is it true that Exec-C14N is actually the more widely deployed spec?

                                        Be seeing you,

[1] http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/02/23/salz.html 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:04:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:45 UTC