w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from July to September 1999 by author

Andreas Schmidt

• XML-Signature scenario proposal (Friday, 17 September)

Andreas Siglreithmayr

• How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Wednesday, 22 September)

Barb Fox (Exchange)

• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Multiple signatures in a sig_block (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: revised XML signature syntax from Oslo (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Monday, 19 July)
• RE: Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Monday, 19 July)
• RE: Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Friday, 16 July)

Bede McCall

• Re: Chair Request: FTF and Con Call input (Thursday, 15 July)

Bob Relyea

• Re: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Thursday, 26 August)

Brown, Sam

• RE: 990930 Minutes (Thursday, 30 September)
• RE: Call for Comments on draft ETSI Electronic Signature Standard (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Wednesday, 8 September)

by way of

• Call for Comments on draft ETSI Electronic Signature Standard (Tuesday, 28 September)
• [Moderator Action] RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• [Moderator Action] Re: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Tuesday, 24 August)
• comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Tuesday, 17 August)
• Disclosure of IPR that "might" be relevant (Thursday, 22 July)
• importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Friday, 16 July)
• reference mechanisms in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Friday, 16 July)

C BELL

• Re: [Re: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g)] (Tuesday, 21 September)

Chris Smithies

• Re: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Friday, 30 July)
• Multiple signatures in a sig_block (Wednesday, 21 July)
• PenOp IPR disclosure (Friday, 2 July)

Dan Connolly

• FYI: Capability Card: An Attribute Certificate in XML (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)

Daniel LaLiberte

• Re: Meaning of document closure (Tuesday, 21 September)

Daniel Veillard

• Re: Will XPath/XPointer Do It? (Sunday, 19 September)

David Burdett

• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Friday, 24 September)
• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: Con Call and XPointer/XPath (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: Signed in parts. Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Wednesday, 8 September)

David Solo

• Syntax issue - reference/object (Monday, 16 August)
• Re: Revised syntax proposal (Monday, 16 August)
• Re: Revised syntax proposal (Thursday, 12 August)
• Revised syntax proposal (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: revised XML signature syntax from Oslo (Tuesday, 20 July)
• revised XML signature syntax from Oslo (Monday, 19 July)

david.solo@citicorp.com

• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Wednesday, 8 September)
• post FTF syntax draft (Wednesday, 1 September)
• syntax and processing draft - update (Sunday, 29 August)
• syntax and processing draft (Friday, 27 August)
• Proposed resolution to detached/embedded and c14n/transform discussion - forward to the past (Tuesday, 24 August)

dee3@us.ibm.com

• rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Friday, 24 September)
• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Tuesday, 17 August)
• RE: Canonicalization RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Canonicalization RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Re: [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] content inclusion (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: Minutes from FTF 99/07/12-13 (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: Minutes from FTF 99/07/12-13 (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Con Call Thursday, 22 July (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: Chair Request: FTF and Con Call input (Thursday, 15 July)
• Chair Request: FTF and Con Call input (Wednesday, 14 July)
• XMLDSIG Oslo WG Agenda (Thursday, 1 July)

Denis Pinkas

• Call for Comments on draft ETSI Electronic Signature Standard (Tuesday, 28 September)

DJ

• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• 30 Sep 99 Con Call reminder and agenda (Thursday, 30 September)
• 23 Sep 99 Con Call reminder and agenda (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Will XPath/XPointer Do It? (Sunday, 19 September)
• Re: Meaning of Document Closure (Friday, 17 September)
• Re: Meaning of Document Closure (Friday, 17 September)
• Chair Announce: Updated Conference Call Info (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: Character canonicalization and XML encoding declarations (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: minor naming point (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Minutes of 990909-tele (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Added conference calls, goal for WG syntax draft (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Con Call reminder and agenda (Thursday, 9 September)
• minor comments on Requirements (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Re: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Chair Announce: Conference Call Info (Friday, 3 September)
• Aug 30-31 1999 F2F Agenda (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Monday, 23 August)
• Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Monday, 23 August)
• Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Monday, 23 August)
• Please respond if you are attending the August 30-31st Face to Face (Monday, 16 August)
• Corrected minutes, of XMLDSIG Conference Call, 5 August 1999 (Monday, 9 August)
• XML encoding rules for ASN.1 (Friday, 6 August)
• Draft minuts, August 5th teleconference (Thursday, 5 August)
• August Face to Face Nudge and Rought Agenda (Thursday, 5 August)
• Chair Announce: Aug 5th and Aug 19th con calls (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Logistics for August Face to Face Meeting (Monday, 26 July)
• Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Thursday, 15 July)

Dr. Peter Chen

• Data Model Issues and Teleconferencing Time (Thursday, 22 July)

Ed Simon

• RE: Re[2]: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Monday, 20 September)
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Monday, 20 September)
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archivin g) (Friday, 17 September)
• Accessing relatively arbitrary spans of an XML instance (of speci al interest to Peter Norman I think) (Saturday, 11 September)
• Ed's timeline for the next few weeks (Thursday, 9 September)
• Character canonicalization and XML encoding declarations (Thursday, 9 September)
• The feasibility of adding a transformation step before the canoni calization step (Thursday, 19 August)
• Canonicalization: Effect on XSL stylesheets and legal implicatio ns (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Monday, 2 August)

EKR

• Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Friday, 20 August)

Greg Whitehead

• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Wednesday, 22 September)
• XHASH / DOMHASH (Monday, 20 September)

Hiroshi Maruyama

• Re: XHASH / DOMHASH (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: Chair Request: Expected Attendance at DSig FTF (Monday, 16 August)
• Comments on the latest C14n draft (Thursday, 22 July)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-trade-hiroshi-dom-hash-02.txt (Tuesday, 7 September)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-01.txt (Thursday, 26 August)

John Boyer

• RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: DataModel Types and Values in Solo's Draft (Thursday, 23 September)
• XPointer vs. FragID: No such contest (Thursday, 23 September)
• Con Call Discussion of Marker Elements (Thursday, 23 September)
• RE: Summary of Closure Argument (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Monday, 20 September)
• RE: Meaning of document closure (Monday, 20 September)
• RE: Meaning of Document Closure (Friday, 17 September)
• RE: Meaning of Document Closure (Friday, 17 September)
• RE: Meaning of Document Closure (Thursday, 16 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RE: Con Call and XPointer/XPath (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Meaning of Document Closure (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Peter's RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Thursday, 9 September)
• Re: Con Call and XPointer/XPath (Thursday, 9 September)
• XFDL and Xptr example (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: Signed in parts. Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Wednesday, 8 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Friday, 3 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Thursday, 2 September)
• RE: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: The feasibility of adding a transformation step before the canoni calization step (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: Scenarios upgrade and Data Model RSN (Thursday, 19 August)
• FW: did you ever send your comments to fragments? (Tuesday, 17 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Tuesday, 17 August)
• RE: verifying order of resources in a document (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: verifying order of resources in a document (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: note on requirements (was RE: verifying order of resources in a document) (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Local time (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: note on requirements (was RE: verifying order of resources in a d ocument) (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: verifying order of resources in a document (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Timestamping was RE: Location volatility of XML (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Multiple signatures in same sig element (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Feedback on requirements (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Location volatility of XML (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Disclosure of IPR that "might" be relevant (Thursday, 22 July)
• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> (Wednesday, 21 July)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• 990930 Minutes (Thursday, 30 September)
• Re: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: RD Comments (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: DataModel Types and Values in Solo's Draft (Thursday, 23 September)
• DataModel Types and Values in Solo's Draft (Thursday, 23 September)
• My Edited Core Syntax Version (Thursday, 23 September)
• 990923 Minutes (More on Closure) (Thursday, 23 September)
• Canonicalizer.java (Thursday, 23 September)
• Summary of Closure Argument (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: XHASH / DOMHASH (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archivin g) (Friday, 17 September)
• Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• More on XPath/Ptr and Information Set (Friday, 17 September)
• Re: Meaning of Document Closure (Thursday, 16 September)
• RE: Con Call and XPointer/XPath (Thursday, 16 September)
• New Requirements Draft (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RE: minor naming point (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: minor naming point (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: XFDL and Xptr example (Friday, 10 September)
• Re: Con Call and XPointer/XPath (Friday, 10 September)
• Minutes of 990909-tele (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Wednesday, 8 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Latest Draft in HTML (Thursday, 2 September)
• Re: Time for C14N PR? (Thursday, 2 September)
• Irvine Rough Minutes (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: AW: Input (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Wednesday, 25 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Description of the Problem (Tuesday, 24 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution to detached/embedded and c14n/transform discussion - forward to the past (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution to detached/embedded and c14n/transform discussion - forward to the past (Tuesday, 24 August)
• FTF Reading List (Monday, 23 August)
• Comments on the C14N Draft (Monday, 23 August)
• Comments on Scenarios (Monday, 23 August)
• Tweaks to data model (Monday, 23 August)
• XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Friday, 20 August)
• Data Model Semantics and Syntax (Friday, 20 August)
• Data Model (Thursday, 19 August)
• Fragment Identifier and Application/MIME type behaviour (Thursday, 19 August)
• Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Thursday, 19 August)
• Scenarios upgrade and Data Model RSN (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• xmldsig call 16:00 EST (4:00 pm) 19990819 (Wednesday, 18 August)
• xmldsig call 16:00 EST (4:00 pm) [DATE] (Wednesday, 18 August)
• Chair Announce: xmldsig requirements moving to last call (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• Re: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Tuesday, 17 August)
• Chair Request: Expected Attendance at DSig FTF (Monday, 16 August)
• regrets: might be late to today's call (Thursday, 5 August)
• Chair Announce: Final Call and Potential Contributors for Requirements Document (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: Understanding what Signed XML is used for - Was: Re: importi (Monday, 2 August)
• RE: on criticality flags (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: on criticality flags (Thursday, 29 July)
• Canonical XML WD Published (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Understanding what Signed XML is used for - Was: Re: importi (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Feedback on requirements (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Chair Consensus: One More Week on Requirements for I post to XML Plenary and W3C Chairs (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: Feedback on requirements (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: Location volatility of XML (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: reference mechanisms in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Monday, 26 July)
• Data Model Design: Referents and Resources (Saturday, 24 July)
• Chair Consensus: 990722-tele Minutes (Thursday, 22 July)
• Chair Consensus: Latest Requirements Draft (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Minutes from FTF 99/07/12-13 (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Contributor, Copyright and Attribution Policy (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: reference mechanisms in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Minutes from FTF 99/07/12-13 (Thursday, 15 July)
• The HTML version of the Brown Draft is now available (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Filled Form (Lucent Patent Disclosure From) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• W3C Approved XML Signature Working Group (xmldsig) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• woops: sorry that last one got sent so many times, list bug. (Thursday, 1 July)
• Chair ...IPR Disclosures (Thursday, 1 July)
• Chair Announce: IPR Disclosures (Thursday, 1 July)
• Chair Requuest: IPR Disclosures (Thursday, 1 July)
• Chair Announce: Lucent IPR Disclosure (Thursday, 1 July)
• Chair Announce: PenOpIPR Disclosure (Thursday, 1 July)
• Chair Request: IPR Disclosures (Thursday, 1 July)

Mark Bartel

• RE: minor naming point (Tuesday, 14 September)
• minor naming point (Tuesday, 14 September)
• more comments on scenarios (Wednesday, 25 August)
• vacation note (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: verifying order of resources in a document (Tuesday, 3 August)
• RE: verifying order of resources in a document (Friday, 30 July)
• going astray (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: note on requirements (was RE: verifying order of resources in a document) (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: verifying order of resources in a document (Thursday, 29 July)
• note on requirements (was RE: verifying order of resources in a d ocument) (Wednesday, 28 July)
• verifying order of resources in a document (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Friday, 16 July)

Mary_Ellen_Zurko@iris.com

• Re: Minutes from FTF 99/07/12-13 (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Minutes from FTF 99/07/12-13 (Wednesday, 21 July)

Milton M. Anderson

• Re: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• Line End Treatment in WD-xml-c14n-1990729.html "Canonical XML" (Thursday, 5 August)

Paul Grosso

• Re: Request for Dependency Resolution or Review (Friday, 17 September)
• RE: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Wednesday, 25 August)

Paul Lambert

• W3C Standards for Cleaning Compositions - was Re: Chair Announce: PenOpIPR Disclosure (Thursday, 1 July)

Peter Lipp

• WG: AW: syntax and processing draft - update (Tuesday, 31 August)
• AW: syntax and processing draft - update (Monday, 30 August)
• AW: Input (Thursday, 26 August)
• Input (Wednesday, 25 August)
• AW: Con Call Thursday, 22 July (Wednesday, 21 July)
• AW: Minutes from FTF 99/07/12-13 (Wednesday, 21 July)
• AW: revised XML signature syntax from Oslo (Tuesday, 20 July)
• AW: Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Monday, 19 July)
• AW: revised XML signature syntax from Oslo (Monday, 19 July)

Peter Norman

• RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Re: Will XPath/XPointer Do It? (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal (Thursday, 9 September)

Phillip M Hallam-Baker

• RE: Meaning of document closure (Monday, 20 September)
• RE: Minutes of 990909-tele (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: Signed in parts. Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Wednesday, 25 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Tuesday, 24 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Tuesday, 24 August)
• RE: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: The feasibility of adding a transformation step before the canoni calization step (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Friday, 20 August)
• Issue: Placement of KEYINFO data (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: Canonicalization RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: on criticality flags (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: on criticality flags (Thursday, 29 July)

rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

• Re[2]: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)

Richard D. Brown

• RD Comments (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2 (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: XHASH / DOMHASH (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: ID Mapping (Monday, 23 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Monday, 16 August)
• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Friday, 13 August)
• Ooops: Sorry, part of the message was not intended to the list (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: Revised syntax proposal (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: Line End Treatment in WD-xml-c14n-1990729.html "Canonical XML" (Thursday, 5 August)
• XML C14N Comments (Thursday, 5 August)
• RE: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Multiple signatures in a sig_block (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: revised XML signature syntax from Oslo (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: revised XML signature syntax from Oslo (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: I have a couple of comments for your draft. (Thursday, 8 July)

Richard Himes

• Re: ID Mapping (Wednesday, 25 August)
• ID Mapping (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: Scenarios upgrade and Data Model RSN (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Saturday, 31 July)
• Re: Understanding what Signed XML is used for - Was: Re: importi (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Sunday, 25 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: The HTML version of the Brown Draft is now available (Wednesday, 14 July)

Roger Collins

• RE: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Thursday, 23 September)
• greetings (Wednesday, 22 September)

Scott McLeod

• RE: Disclosure of IPR that "might" be relevant (Monday, 26 July)

tgindin@us.ibm.com

• Re: AW: syntax and processing draft - update (Tuesday, 31 August)
• RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags (Wednesday, 28 July)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Meaning of document closure (Saturday, 18 September)
• Signed in parts. Re: XML-Signatures Requirements Last Call (Wednesday, 8 September)

Todd S. Glassey

• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Saturday, 24 July)
• Re: Disclosure of IPR that "might" be relevant (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Multiple signatures in a sig_block (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Multiple signatures in a sig_block (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Location of August 30-31 1999 Face to Face (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Friday, 16 July)

tog

• Re: verifying order of resources in a document (Saturday, 31 July)
• Re: verifying order of resources in a document (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Understanding what Signed XML is used for - Was: Re: importi (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: importing terminology in "XML-Signature Requirements" (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Understanding what Signed XML is used for - Was: Re: importi (Thursday, 29 July)

Tomokazu ISHII

• PEM2XMLDSIG (Thursday, 19 August)

Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III

• Re: How to sign several resources (XML and XSL)? (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: minor naming point (why full names are important for archiv in g) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: Feedback on requirements (Wednesday, 28 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 1999 13:53:09 UTC