W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: on criticality flags

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:58:35 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990730175835.009ed100@localhost>
To: "Phillip M Hallam-Baker" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III" <Winchel@mindspring.com>
Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:25 PM 7/29/99 -0400, Phillip M Hallam-Baker wrote:
 >Yes, I can send you a copy of my D.Phil 

Would you be willing to work with Todd to develop good natural language and
formal definitions [1] of the terms? I was originally planning to use LARCH
to be consistent (see [1]) but that isn't critical (consistency across
relevant documents and ease of readability to non-experts are more important
I think).

[1]  http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xml-dsig-definitions-990728.html
_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 30 July 1999 17:58:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:07 GMT