W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2

From: Richard D. Brown <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:16:18 -0500
To: <dee3@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001401bf0903$a25f9c30$0bc0010a@artemis.globeset.com>
Don,

I'm sorry, but I still do not understand 3.2.2 requirement.

Cheers,

RDB

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of dee3@us.ibm.com
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 3:41 PM
> To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
> Subject: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2
> 
> 
> It is a bit verbose but here is what I came up with
> 
> 
> OLD:
> 
> 2.An XML document of a certain type must still be 
> recognizable as its original
> type when signed. For
>               example, an XML form, when signed, should still 
> be recognizable as
> a XML form to its application
>               after it has been signed. [WS-summary]
> 
> 
> NEW:
> 
> 2. It must be easy to specify XML documents that contain 
> signatures.  For XML
> signatures, it must be easy to specify the material that is 
> signed such that
> they can be inserted within a document and cover all or part 
> of the document
> outside of the inserted signature.  The intent is that, for 
> example, an XML form
> can be specified such that it is still recognizable as its 
> original type after a
> signature over all or most of the form (other than the 
> signature iteself) is
> inserted within the form. [WS-summary]
> 
> 
> Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd
> 17 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA
> dee3@us.ibm.com   tel: 1-914-784-7913, fax: 1-914-784-3833
> 
> home: 65 Shindegan Hill Road, RR#1, Carmel, NY 10512 USA
> dee3@torque.pothole.com   tel: 1-914-276-2668
> 
Received on Monday, 27 September 1999 12:17:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:07 GMT