- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:22:44 -0400
- To: <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
- Cc: "'IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:01 99/08/18 -0500, Richard D. Brown wrote: >Fair. In that case, consider "An XML-signature must be an XML element as >specified by the production labeled element in the XML specification." But it's more than an element. I'm rather happy with the constrained definition from xml-fragment, is there a reason you oppose this? _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 1999 13:22:50 UTC