W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:22:44 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
Cc: "'IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:01 99/08/18 -0500, Richard D. Brown wrote:
 >Fair. In that case, consider "An XML-signature must be an XML element as
 >specified by the production labeled element in the XML specification."

But it's more than an element. I'm rather happy with the constrained
definition from xml-fragment, is there a reason you oppose this?

Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 1999 13:22:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:31 UTC