At 17:45 99/09/08 -0400, david.solo@citicorp.com wrote: >> At 12:06 99/09/07 -0700, John Boyer wrote: >> >>Consensus. The reference from SignedInfo will just be a >> URI. This can then >> >> point to a manifest or package which can use Xlink/Xptr/Xpath as >> >>appropriate. This means you don't have to worry about >> Xptr in the core >> >>signature syntax. >> >Perhaps I misunderstood what that meant. Did you just mean >> that we could >> >punt the problem of having to make up a syntax for >> exclusion? Please >> >clarify. >> >> For the core syntax yes. > >I agree we need to clarify the types of references in the spec (on the todo >list). I'm sorry, are you saying exlusion/XPtr is in the core syntax, or not? _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Wednesday, 8 September 1999 18:41:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:07 GMT