W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: Irvine Minutes and ost-FTF syntax proposal

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 18:40:16 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990908184016.00a59790@localhost>
To: david.solo@citicorp.com
Cc: jboyer@uwi.com, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
At 17:45 99/09/08 -0400, david.solo@citicorp.com wrote:
 >> At 12:06 99/09/07 -0700, John Boyer wrote:
 >>  >>Consensus. The reference from SignedInfo will just be a 
 >> URI. This can then
 >>  >>  point to a manifest or package which can use Xlink/Xptr/Xpath as
 >>  >>appropriate.     This means you don't have to worry about 
 >> Xptr in the core
 >>  >>signature syntax.
 >>  >Perhaps I misunderstood what that meant.  Did you just mean 
 >> that we could
 >>  >punt the problem of having to make up a syntax for 
 >> exclusion?  Please
 >>  >clarify.
 >> 
 >> For the core syntax yes.
 >
 >I agree we need to clarify the types of references in the spec (on the
todo 
 >list).

I'm sorry, are you saying exlusion/XPtr is in the core syntax, or not?


_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 1999 18:41:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:07 GMT