W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:07:37 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
Cc: <dee3@us.ibm.com>, "'IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "'John Boyer'" <jboyer@uwi.com>
At 09:10 99/08/18 -0500, Richard D. Brown wrote:
 >> Done. Richard if you object, say so.
 >Agreed to some extent. Negotiation tends to imply some form of handshake
 >(multiple exchanges) during establishement of the key. However, I think
 >"agreement" or "exchange" would be more accurate. The method that is used
 >establish the key is not necessarily based upon mathematics.

I now use agreement.

 >Why not simply "An XML-signature must be a well-formed XML element"

There is no definition of "well-formed XML element."

Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 1999 12:07:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:31 UTC