W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc

From: Richard D. Brown <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:01:11 -0500
To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>
Cc: "'IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01b701bee99b$46d501c0$0bc0010a@artemis.globeset.com>

Joseph,

Comment Follows...

>  >Why not simply "An XML-signature must be a well-formed XML element"
>
> There is no definition of "well-formed XML element."
>

Fair. In that case, consider "An XML-signature must be an XML element as
specified by the production labeled element in the XML specification."

Richard D.

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 1999 13:01:41 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Joseph M. Reagle Jr.: "RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc"
Previous message: Joseph M. Reagle Jr.: "xmldsig call 16:00 EST (4:00 pm) 19990819"
In reply to: Joseph M. Reagle Jr.: "RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc"
Next in thread: Joseph M. Reagle Jr.: "RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc"
Reply: Joseph M. Reagle Jr.: "RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:07 GMT