W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags

From: Chris Smithies <Chris_Smithies@penop.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 11:37:11 +0100
To: david.solo@citicorp.com
cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-ID: <852567BE.00398AE5.00@penop.com>



If canonicalization entails loss of time-zone information, then I predict
the FDA (for one) won't accept canonicalized time-stamps as signature
time-stamps. Perhaps the solution would be to canonicalize the time-zone
information separately.

Received on Friday, 30 July 1999 06:32:24 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Bartel: "going astray"
Previous message: John Boyer: "RE: verifying order of resources in a document"
Maybe in reply to: John Boyer: "Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags"
Next in thread: Phillip M Hallam-Baker: "RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags"
Reply: Phillip M Hallam-Baker: "RE: Brown draft feedback on time stamping and on criticality flags"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:07 GMT