W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2

From: Richard D. Brown <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:51:05 -0500
To: "'John Boyer'" <jboyer@uwi.com>, <dee3@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001601bf0910$dfdc80c0$0bc0010a@artemis.globeset.com>
John,

Are we trying to say something like:

"It shall be possible to embed an XML Signature element at any location
within an XML document and to specify the scope of the signature
independently of such location."

Sincerely,

Richard D. Brown

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Boyer [mailto:jboyer@uwi.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 12:32 PM
> To: rdbrown@Globeset.com; dee3@us.ibm.com; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
> Subject: RE: rewrite of requirements 3.2.2
>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Since this one seems to matter a lot to me, how about
> something like this:
>
> 2. It must be easy to specify XML documents that contain
> signatures.  For
> XML signatures, it must be easy to specify the material that
> is signed such
> that signatures can be inserted within a document and cover
> all or part of
> the document outside of the inserted signature.  The intent
> is that the root
> element tag remain invariant under the operation of signature
> creation.
>
> John Boyer
> Software Development Manager
> UWI.Com -- The Internet Forms Company
>
Received on Monday, 27 September 1999 13:52:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:07 GMT