public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from May 2008 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: comments from PFWG on RDFa in XHTML spec (Thursday, 22 May)

Ben Adida

• telecon (Thursday, 29 May)
• ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: [RDFa] Comments on the RDFa Primer (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: RDFa Primer -- some comments (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: Reminder: regrets for this week (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Thursday Telecon (Wednesday, 21 May)
• following up on ISSUE-110, @src (Wednesday, 21 May)
• following up on ISSUE-109, @cite (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Mark, Ben - please review TC#105 & TC#106 (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: Real URLs for real things (Thursday, 15 May)
• quick update (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain. (Friday, 9 May)
• ISSUE-99 follow-up (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: comments from PFWG on RDFa in XHTML spec (Thursday, 8 May)
• non-normative paragraph for the HTML fragment issue, ISSUE-113 (Thursday, 8 May)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 8 May 2008 (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: xsd:date or xsd:#date? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: JS Test Harness (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Explanation of Updates to RDFa Syntax (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)

Benjamin Nowack

• Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Monday, 19 May)

Christian Hoertnagl

• Re: ISSUE-7 : Response to Comments from Christian Hoertnagl (Tuesday, 13 May)

Dan Brickley

• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Saturday, 10 May)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML (Wednesday, 28 May)

Dave Beckett

• Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Saturday, 17 May)
• Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Friday, 2 May)

Ed Summers

• Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review (Tuesday, 13 May)

Elias Torres

• JS Test Harness (Tuesday, 6 May)

Hausenblas, Michael

• RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 29 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 29 May)
• RE: Crazy Ivan update (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: crazy ivan question? (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: Test #53 (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases (Monday, 26 May)
• RE: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases (Monday, 26 May)
• [RDFa TC] Update (Monday, 26 May)
• RE: Real URLs for real things (Wednesday, 21 May)
• RE: Thursday Telecon (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [RDFa TC] Updates (Monday, 19 May)
• RE: Real URLs for real things (Thursday, 15 May)
• RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 (Thursday, 15 May)
• RE: Test Case #109: xml:base should be ignored in XHTML+RDFa 1.0 (Wednesday, 14 May)
• [RDFa TC ] Update (Tuesday, 13 May)
• RE: [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web] (Tuesday, 13 May)
• RE: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)
• RE: JS Test Harness (Wednesday, 7 May)
• [RDFa IR] Updates (Monday, 5 May)
• AW: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)

Ivan Herman

• RDF and the Monkey (Yahoo! Developer Network blog) (Saturday, 31 May)
• Re: librdfa fully conformant - passes 86/86 Test Cases (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) (Wednesday, 28 May)
• crazy ivan question? (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Test #53 (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: [RDFa TC] Update (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: TC#88: Interpretation of _: CURIE (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] (Saturday, 17 May)
• Re: Preservation of namespaces in XML Literals (was Re: RDFa Test Harness) (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Test Case #17: specifying named bnode relationships (Monday, 12 May)
• (Answer #2) Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute (Thursday, 8 May)
• a relevant reading: ARIA attributes (Thursday, 8 May)
• comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute (Thursday, 8 May)
• Digg and RDFa... (Sunday, 4 May)
• Re: Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)

James Pickering

• Serving and Validating XHTML+RDFa (Thursday, 8 May)

KANZAKI Masahide

• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Silly Question - do we need to explicitly say what to do with illegal URIs? (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: Digg and RDFa... (Monday, 5 May)

Laurens Holst

• Re: following up on ISSUE-110, @src (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: following up on ISSUE-109, @cite (Wednesday, 21 May)

Laurian Gridinoc

• Re: Real URLs for real things (Thursday, 15 May)

Lyndon Nixon

• CfP PICKME, the 3rd ExpertFinder workshop (Tuesday, 13 May)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 (Thursday, 29 May)
• librdfa fully conformant - passes 86/86 Test Cases (Thursday, 29 May)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 29 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 29 May)
• Implementation issue with TC#78 (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: [RDFa TC] Update (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: [RDFa TC] Update (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Crazy Ivan update (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases (Monday, 26 May)
• Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: [RDFa TC] Update (Monday, 26 May)
• TC#103 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated (Saturday, 24 May)
• TC#102 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated (Saturday, 24 May)
• TC#101 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated (Saturday, 24 May)
• TC#100 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated (Saturday, 24 May)
• TC#94 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated (Saturday, 24 May)
• TC#92 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated (Saturday, 24 May)
• Mark, Ben - please review TC#105 & TC#106 (Monday, 19 May)
• TC#88: Interpretation of _: CURIE (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Sunday, 18 May)
• RDFa TC#11 SPARQL is incorrect (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Sunday, 18 May)
• 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Saturday, 17 May)
• [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] (Thursday, 15 May)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Test Case #109: xml:base should be ignored in XHTML+RDFa 1.0 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: RDFa in the FAO FNA we site (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Test Case #17 (v2): specifying named bnode relationships (Monday, 12 May)
• Preservation of namespaces in XML Literals (was Re: RDFa Test Harness) (Monday, 12 May)
• Test Case #42 (v2): on IMG element @src specifies subject, not object (Monday, 12 May)
• Renaming Test Case #42 (was Re: Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object) (Monday, 12 May)
• Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object (Monday, 12 May)
• Test Case #108: Specifying a plain literal with datatype="" and xml:lang preservation (Monday, 12 May)
• Test Case #107: Specifying a plain literal with datatype="" (Monday, 12 May)
• Test Case #17: specifying named bnode relationships (Monday, 12 May)
• librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor (Sunday, 11 May)
• Resolving ON HOLD Test Cases (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• Test Case #106: chaining with empty value in inner @rel (Saturday, 10 May)
• Test Case #105 (v2): inner @rel is neither CURIE nor LinkType behavior (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior (Saturday, 10 May)
• ISSUE-7 : Response to Comments from Christian Hoertnagl (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: following up on ISSUE-110, @src (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] (Saturday, 17 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Nested hanging rels (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain. (Friday, 9 May)

Micah Dubinko

• Re: telecon (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: RDFa functional spec (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RDFa functional spec (Wednesday, 21 May)
• xsd:date or xsd:#date? (Thursday, 1 May)

Michael Schneider

• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Saturday, 10 May)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] (Friday, 16 May)

Norman Walsh

• Re: xsd:date or xsd:#date? (Wednesday, 7 May)

Pete Johnston

• RE: Real URLs for real things (Wednesday, 21 May)

Ralph R. Swick

• meeting record: 2008-05-29 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Thursday, 29 May)
• meeting record: 2008-05-15 RDFa telecon (Thursday, 15 May)
• meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon (Thursday, 1 May)

Renato golin

• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)

Roland Merrick

• RDFa Primer -- some comments (Thursday, 8 May)

Seaborne, Andy

• RE: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Sunday, 18 May)
• RE: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues (Saturday, 17 May)

Sergio Fernández

• CfP: 1st Social Data on the Web workshop (SDoW2008) (Tuesday, 6 May)

Shane McCarron

• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Draft: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML (Wednesday, 21 May)
• New draft of RDFa Syntax available (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web] (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web] (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)
• Silly Question - do we need to explicitly say what to do with illegal URIs? (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain. (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Serving and Validating XHTML+RDFa (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: xsd:date or xsd:#date? (Thursday, 1 May)
• Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft (Thursday, 1 May)

Simone Onofri

• Re: Reminder: regrets for this week (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)

Sini, Margherita (KCEW)

• RDFa in the FAO FNA we site (Tuesday, 13 May)
• RE: [RDFa] Comments on the RDFa Primer (Monday, 5 May)

Steven Pemberton

• Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: RDFa functional spec (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Draft: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Reminder: regrets for this week (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Real URLs for real things (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Real URLs for real things (Thursday, 15 May)
• Real URLs for real things (Thursday, 15 May)
• Last call announcement: CURIEs (Thursday, 8 May)
• Regrets (Thursday, 1 May)

SWD Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type (Friday, 9 May)

Tim Finin

• ISWC 2008 deadlines this week and next (Monday, 5 May)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: [RDFa TC] Update (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 May)

Toby Inkster

• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 (Friday, 9 May)

Tore Eriksson

• Re: Nested hanging rels (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Nested hanging rels (Wednesday, 14 May)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2008 07:34:05 UTC